I’m replying to a comment Elizabeth made on the previous post about Women, Math and scientific ability. (BTW, you’re welcome to comment on ANY of my posts folks!) *** *** *** *** Hi Elizabeth, thanks for posting your story of the lesbian transsexual. Libido and math ability enhanced on male hormones, interesting! (but probably not suprising) I heard a geneticist on the radio a few months ago say that while all babies start out female in the womb, a wave of testosterone is released that masculinizes boy fetuses and also wipes out up to 70% of the communications center, among other areas in the brain. He likened the effects of testosterone to acid saying it could well be used as a weed killer, of all things.
I also think of the sex and the brain research I read in grad school in the early 80s. One thing that stuck with me that I read - in primitive tribal times, by virtue of biology, women looked after the children and needed to be aware of spatial relationships only as they concerned the space between toddling children and dangers such as a cave mouth or open fire for instance. Their use for such a spatial/relational skill was minimal however, and children were comparatively slow moving targets. They had a greater need to know what was going on socially to keep interactions peaceful to maintain the status quo for the stability of the whole tribe. The conclusions at the time were that this was how women developed intuitive, creative answers to problems.
In contrast, the men who went out hunting and gathering needed immense pattern recognition skills to tell friend from foe, when dangerous animals or geographical situations were present or imminent and the like. They had little need for social skills except to communicate around the needs of the hunt. This they theorized, was how men evolved logical, spatially oriented coping skills. (and yes, I realize this is a greatly, greatly over-simplified overview)
It seems like a reasonable theory to me, and as a woman or man, I’d not feel demeaned by it. Even in the lifespan of one person, they will develop new skills in relation to their occupation, geographical locale and the like. It’s a reasonable surmise. So to conclude, I see nothing wrong with acknowledging thousands of years of evolution that play towards men having a better shot at being math geniuses, women at being therapists for instance… but then there are always exceptions to that seeming rule.
And of them are women like Sophie Germain, a natural exception, who contributed significantly to solving Fermat’s last theorum by playing a man to do so. (www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/proof/germain.html) And take your pick of famous male therapists.
There is also a lot to be said for nature versus nurture. Until very recently, girls were not given all the educational opportunities boys were. Boys were taught a certain curriculum and girls, another, if they were taught at all. That curriculum certainly did not include the sciences. Until very recently in historic time. Many of the female savants that have come through the ages usually had a parent or other authority figure actively tutoring them or otherwise allowing free access to knowledge in the "male" domain.
It will be interesting for future writers several hundred years from now to look back upon this period and note all of the women AND men who excelled in professions heretofore barred to their sex, which have sprung from the 20th century on forward.
What might we all do, when unbound from the conventions of society - and even more, from the limits of our own belief systems?
The possibilities are literally, endless.